THE NETHERLANDS. There has still been no drop in the proportion of PhD students being offered a short-term contract or a part-time appointment. There are large differences between universities, however, notes the Dutch network for PhD students, Promovendi Netwerk Nederland (PNN).
PhD positions at Dutch universities are supposed to be full-time for four years, as agreed in the collective labour agreement of July 2018. The proportion of PhD student contracts not meeting this requirement has fluctuated between 10 and 15 percent in recent years.
Things were no different in 2019, according to the new monitor of terms and conditions of employment, as published by PNN. More than twelve percent of PhD students were offered a ‘dubious contract’ last year: they have to settle for a contract of less than four years or a part-time appointment.
But there are large differences between universities, according to PNN. At TU Eindhoven, for example, only 1.5 percent of the contracts offered are of a dubious nature. There is room for improvement at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (20.3 percent), the University of Groningen (20.2 percent) and the Erasmus University Rotterdam (19 percent).
Moreover, the vast majority of vacancy announcements for PhD positions are still far too vague when it comes to terms of employment, according to the PNN monitor. The network examined 1872 vacancy texts. Not all of them mention the duration of the appointment, the salary or whether the PhD student is expected to teach.
Some universities score better than others on this criterion too. At TU Delft, more than 98 percent of the vacancy texts are sufficiently transparent. At the other end of the spectrum are Radboud University Nijmegen, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Wageningen University & Research, where no more than 15 percent of vacancy texts provide sufficient information.
This is the first PNN monitor to reveal differences between institutions. “Universities love rankings,” says network chairperson Lucille Mattijssen. “When they score at or near the top, they shout it from the rooftops. But perhaps more importantly: no one wants to be ranked at the bottom.”
The problem with dubious contracts was certainly present in years past, Mattijssen explains. “But no one really seemed to care. Now you can plainly see which universities are playing by the rules. Hopefully the others will take notice and mend their ways.”
HOP, Evelien Flink