Series about scientific integrity

Together with the Platform for Research Ethics and Integrity, Observant has drawn up six dilemmas that researchers may face. The Platform for Research Ethics and Integrity, which was set up in 2018, has set itself the objective to promote a healthy research culture at the UM. They do so by making researchers aware of the pitfalls and by starting a discussion on the subject.

For quite some time, PhD candidates have been able to involve a confidential adviser in cases of conflicts with colleagues, just like every researcher can do with the UM confidential adviser. Should the conflict touch on scientific integrity, a report will be filed with the Committee for Scientific Integrity. They have been investigating complaints of scientific misconduct since 2012. This was prompted, among others, by the Stapel Affair, in which a psychology professor from Tilburg was exposed as a fraud.

Taking off with someone else’s data

Taking off with someone else’s data

As an economist, you have gotten your hands on someone else’s enormous mountain of data, which a business has made available. You know that with this data you can deliver a series of great articles. After the first publication, a colleague from the US asks if he can take a look at your rough data. What do you do? Share? With the risk that the researcher publishes follow-up articles based on ‘your’ data?

On the temptations of predatory publishing

On the temptations of predatory publishing

A recently founded journal has asked if they could publish your research but you wonder if the editor concerned will carry out a scientific check (peer review). Do you accept the request? Or do you offer your text to another journal, which does follow the scientific guidelines?

Accepting money from companies, but still remaining credible

Accepting money from companies, but still remaining credible

You are commissioned by a company to investigate whether a drink provides energy. The results are without a shadow of a doubt: there is no connection between the drink and energy levels. However, you estimate that there is a good chance of follow-up assignments. Do you adapt your formulations in the journal so that you can stay in the race?

Giving money is not done, offering help is

Giving money is not done, offering help is

You want to interview refugees and migrants on their journey, but they must – as is good scientific practice – first give permission and sign a form. Many refugees however, will never put their signature on anything. How do you deal with that? Also, what if a participant asks for money? Can you always refuse?

Making minced meat of a thesis

Making minced meat of a thesis

You are on an assessment committee as a professor and you feel that the quality of the thesis concerned is below standard. At the same time, the five articles meet the required scientific standard, because they have all been published. Do you make a point of it or not?