“If you lower the bar in first year, there will be more pressure in second year”

“If you lower the bar in first year, there will be more pressure in second year”

University Council discusses standards for binding study advice

07-06-2023 · News

MAASTRICHT. The Executive Board, just like other universities in the Netherlands, sees little point in lowering the BSA standard to 30 credits (of the 60 in total). Students in the University Council are not enthusiastic either about education minister Dijkgraaf’s plans aimed at lowering study pressure.

Two faculties in Maastricht don’t have a BSA, says rector Pamela Habibović: Health Medicine and Life Sciences and Law. At FHML, “it doesn’t fit in with the examination system” (programme-based testing), at the Faculty of Law, a pilot is being carried out at the moment in which the BSA (with a negative advice, the student has to leave) is replaced by a non-binding advice. There are no definite results yet, the rector stated, but it would appear that law students who are told that the study programme is not suitable for them, often stay anyway.

The standard at the other Maastricht faculties is around 45 credits, just like at most other Dutch universities. An exception is Erasmus University Rotterdam: its first-year students must get all 60 ECTS credits to be allowed to continue.

Dropout rate

The BSA was created in order to determine as quickly as possible whether a student was doing the right study programme. If that is not the case and the student continues but doesn’t finish after all, it will cost the institute money. Research by the collective universities (UNL) showed that the dropout rate of students (about 13 per cent with a BSA of 45) in programmes with a BSA is not greater, but they do drop out more quickly, Habibović explained.

None of the student council members appear to be in favour of the minister’s proposal. Charles de Groot (NovUM) supports the Executive Board: 30 credits is not enough, 45 is okay. The same goes for Noël Capetti (DOPE), who pointed out the consequences: “If you lower the bar in first year, there will be more pressure in second year.” That is bad for students’ well-being too, which after all is the reason why Dijkgraaf is currently presenting the plans.

Little low

Annefleur Bruin (DOPE) feels that 30 credits is a little low, she argued, but there could be a little more flexibility, the number 45 is not sacred to her. What worries her is the fact that a student who is sent packing cannot enrol for the same study programme at the same university for some years afterwards. The rector does understand that rule: “Why would it work next time?”

Frustration

There was also approval from the academic staff for the Executive Board’s stance. Luana Russo: “When students eventually reach the point of writing a thesis after years of studying, it often appears that this is an impossible hurdle and it can take a long time for them to complete their studies. This causes frustration, both for students and for staff. It is good that there is a threshold in first year.”

 

 

New chairperson Teun Dekker: academic freedom is never matter of course

Last week, it was the first plenary meeting under the chairmanship of Teun Dekker, who observed, with a wink, during the opening: “I realise that the less a chairperson says, the better it is.” To subsequently say and emphasise how important academic freedom is, “we must never consider this to be matter of course”. He refers, among other things, to Russia, where scientists who do not want to support the war with Ukraine, are having a very tough time at the moment. “If universities lose their autonomy, they lose their souls.”

Author: Riki Janssen

Photo: Observant

Categories: News, news_top
Tags: university council,bsa,binding study advice,study pressure,instagram

Add Response

Click here for our privacy statement.

Since January 2022, Observant only publishes comments of people whose name is known to the editors.